Tories would not support decision to arrest Netanyahu in UK, says Hollinrake

Conservatives Unlikely to Support Arrest of Netanyahu in the UK, says Hollinrake

Traffic Updates
The Shadow Housing Secretary, Kevin Hollinrake, has stated that the Conservative Party would not back a decision to arrest Benjamin Netanyahu if he were to visit the UK. This declaration follows an announcement from Downing Street suggesting that the Israeli Prime Minister could face arrest upon entering Britain due to the issuance of an international arrest warrant against him.
Traffic Updates

While Number 10 declined to offer a direct response regarding hypothetical scenarios, they affirmed that the UK would adhere to its legal obligations. The International Criminal Court (ICC) has issued a warrant for Netanyahu and his former Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant, over alleged war crimes in Gaza.

During an interview on the Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme on Sky News, Hollinrake expressed his stance on the matter. He emphasised that due to Israel not being a signatory to the Rome Statute and Palestine not being recognised as a state, the decision to arrest Netanyahu would be diplomatically and legally misguided, as per his beliefs.

The Prime Minister’s office has previously indicated that the UK has never utilised the domestic process linked to ICC arrest warrants since no individual wanted by the international court had visited the country. In addition to Netanyahu, the ICC has also issued a warrant for Mohammed Deif, the head of Hamas’s armed wing, in connection with attacks that ignited Israel’s offensive in Gaza on October 7, 2023.

If Netanyahu were to set foot in the UK, a domestic court process would need to be initiated before any arrest could take place. The ICC has stated that there are grounds to believe Netanyahu and Gallant are accountable for crimes including starvation as a method of warfare, murder, persecution, and other inhumane acts.

It is noted that the enforcement of these warrants may be constrained, given that neither Israel nor its primary ally, the US, are members of the ICC. The political and legal implications of such actions continue to generate debates within the UK and internationally.

As the situation unfolds, the position of various political parties and governments regarding the execution of ICC warrants and international justice remains a topic of significant interest. The complexities of diplomacy, legal frameworks, and human rights come to the forefront amidst calls for accountability and justice in conflict-affected regions.

In conclusion, the diverging viewpoints on how to address allegations of war crimes and ensure accountability for political leaders underscore the complexities inherent in navigating international law and diplomacy. The implications of potential arrests of high-ranking officials like Netanyahu serve as a reminder of the challenges in balancing legal obligations with diplomatic considerations on the global stage.