Judge questions ‘the Albanian defence’ after man caught in cannabis farm
A recent court case in Wales has cast a spotlight on an Albanian man, Nuredin Hohxa, who was apprehended while working in a cannabis farm in Carmarthen. The judge presiding over the case raised concerns about what he referred to as “the Albanian defence” put forward by Hohxa. The prosecution outlined that police conducted a search at a commercial property in Carmarthen and discovered a substantial cannabis operation, with Hohxa found in the living quarters of the building. The court was informed that the potential value of the cannabis plants found could reach £171,000 if sold in kilos. Additionally, evidence from Hohxa’s phone revealed communications related to the cultivation process.
During the proceedings, Hohxa claimed he had only been at the property for a week before the police raid and denied ownership of the phone discovered at the premises, despite it bearing his name and being linked to his email address. Hohxa stated that he arrived in the UK from France two years ago and purportedly owed a significant debt of €80,000 for his mother’s medical expenses in Albania. Despite pleading guilty to producing cannabis, Hohxa contested that his involvement was limited to caring for the plants rather than setting up the illicit operation. Notably, Hohxa had a clean record in the UK prior to this incident.
In court, Hohxa’s defence counsel highlighted his client’s lack of prior convictions in the UK, although acknowledging his illegal status in the country. The judge, Geraint Walters, expressed scepticism towards the recurring nature of what he termed “the Albanian defence” in similar cases, emphasising the need for transparency and honesty in the legal process. Walters indicated his intention to raise this issue with the resident judge in Swansea, citing a pattern of defendants invoking comparable narratives to justify their actions.
Ultimately, Hohxa was sentenced to 12 months in prison, with eligibility for release after serving half of the term. The judge concluded the sentencing by remarking that any deportation proceedings would fall under the jurisdiction of the Home Office. This case underscores the complexities surrounding drug-related offences and the nuanced considerations that come into play during legal proceedings. It also underscores the importance of judicial vigilance in evaluating the veracity of claims presented in court, particularly those that appear to follow a recurring pattern.
The judiciary in Wales, as exemplified by Judge Walters’ remarks, remains vigilant and discerning in assessing cases involving criminal activities such as drug cultivation. By scrutinising defences presented by defendants, the courts aim to uphold accountability and ensure that justice is served appropriately. Moving forward, cases like this serve as a reminder of the diverse challenges faced by the legal system and the ongoing efforts to uphold the rule of law while addressing the complexities of criminal activities.