Hotel worker threatened to torch business in early-morning attack

A disgruntled hotel worker threatened to set fire to the establishment where he was employed in an early-morning attack. The incident took place at the Ivy Bush hotel in Carmarthen, where the employee, Hefin Rosser, made threats to pour petrol into the hotel reception and ignite it at 3 am. Swansea Crown Court heard that the 47-year-old employee’s actions stemmed from a work-related issue that could have led to a disciplinary procedure against him.

The threats were conveyed through phone calls and messages to a manager of the hotel, the police, and even the defendant’s father. Police discovered Rosser’s car parked behind the hotel at 11.45 pm on the same night, and he was found nearby with lighters, a bottle of wine, and a petrol can. When questioned, Rosser admitted to his intention to burn down the Ivy Bush, stating that he wanted to die and take the place with him.

Rosser, who had no prior convictions, pleaded guilty to making threats to damage property and possessing articles with intent to damage property. His defence lawyer highlighted his client’s history of poor mental health but acknowledged that it did not excuse his behaviour. Judge Paul Thomas KC described Rosser’s actions as “incredibly stupid”, causing significant inconvenience to the hotel and its guests.

Despite the seriousness of the offence, Rosser was sentenced to 12 months in prison, suspended for two years. The judge also ordered him to undergo rehabilitation, alcohol monitoring, and complete 100 hours of unpaid work in the community. Additionally, Rosser was disqualified from driving for 12 months. The court considered Rosser’s time spent on remand awaiting sentencing in determining the final verdict.

The judge emphasised that Rosser’s actions were not only a gross overreaction but also inflicted unnecessary distress on the hotel and its residents. By offering a suspended sentence with rehabilitation requirements, the court aimed to provide a constructive alternative to further incarceration for the defendant. Despite the severity of the incident, Rosser’s sentence took into account his guilty pleas and the potential for rehabilitation.