Single father Christopher Bridge, 32, from Green Avenue in Kinmel Bay, recently appeared at Mold Crown Court after a disturbing incident at a children’s birthday party in Prestatyn. The court heard that Bridge brought a hammer to the party to confront an 11-year-old girl, seeking revenge for an alleged attack on his son. Admitting to his actions, Bridge was charged with affray and two additional offences.
The judge handed Bridge a two-year jail term, which was suspended for two years due to him being the sole carer for his son. Prosecutor Laura Knightly recounted the events leading up to the incident, stating that Bridge arrived at the party and confronted the girl, even using the hammer on the front door of the house. The entire incident, including Bridge’s actions, was captured on a doorbell camera.
Following the party, Bridge was arrested later that month. During the police interview, he was described as shaking his head and appearing to smirk as the allegations were presented to him. In a victim statement, one party attendee expressed fear over Bridge returning to the house, questioning what else he might be capable of after bringing a hammer to a party full of children.
Bridge’s defence barrister, Brett Williamson, acknowledged his client’s shameful behaviour and the fear it instilled in the children at the party. Williamson highlighted that Bridge’s actions were a result of discovering his son had been assaulted at a local park, emphasizing that such trauma did not excuse his subsequent behaviour.
Judge His Honour Niclas Parry condemned Bridge’s actions as “shameful, cowardly, and bullying,” expressing disbelief at a grown man seeking retribution from a young girl. Despite the severity of Bridge’s actions, the judge took into account his role as a sole caregiver, his attempt to maintain employment in construction, and the losses he had already endured due to the case.
In sentencing, the judge ordered Bridge to complete 250 hours of unpaid work, attend 15 days of rehabilitation activities, and pay £750 in compensation to the householder. Additionally, a three-year restraining order was issued to prevent Bridge from contacting the householder directly, indirectly, or via social media, as well as restricting him from approaching her home.
While the judge acknowledged the terrifying impact of Bridge’s actions on the children at the party, he considered Bridge’s unique circumstances and the potential for rehabilitation. The case serves as a reminder of the consequences of seeking vigilante justice and the importance of addressing grievances through legal and appropriate channels.
(Source: Wales Online)