Vale of Glamorgan Council is taking legal action against an amusement park boss for digging up ground near a children’s hospice after being told not to. The business owner behind Barry Island Pleasure Park, Henry Danter, was served with an enforcement notice in January 2024 which ordered him to stop excavation works on his land off Hayes Road in Sully. Mr Danter has said a number of times that it is his dream to turn the land into a holiday park.
However, the idea was met with deep concern from families who use the nearby Ty Hafan Children’s Hospice and a petition opposed to it has received more than 15,000 signatures so far. Mr Danter said the work on the site is only intended to improve its appearance and that they believe they are working within the boundaries of what they are permitted to do.
The leader of Vale of Glamorgan Council, Cllr Lis Burnett, expressed disappointment in Mr Danter’s actions, stating that despite repeated attempts to communicate with him about the regulations, unauthorised work continued. She highlighted the impact of these works on the surrounding area, especially given the proximity to the children’s hospice.
Vale of Glamorgan Council raised concerns about heavy machinery being used for excavation on the site and observed unauthorized activities such as storing HGV trailers, containers, and commercial waste, which contravene land usage regulations. Notably, no planning application has been submitted for a holiday park on the site, with applications so far limited to fencing, storage containers, and caravan storage.
Mr Danter defended the excavation as part of efforts to install a new boundary fence and manage weeds. The council issued temporary stop notices and enforcement notices in response to these activities, but Mr Danter maintains that their actions are within the permitted scope. Cllr Burnett affirmed the council’s commitment to upholding planning regulations and protecting the surrounding community.
Mr Danter attempted to justify the work as necessary to revamp the site’s appearance, refuting claims of improper use or storage of commercial waste. While he seeks to engage with local authorities directly to address concerns, the council emphasised the need for compliance with planning policies.
Despite ongoing disputes between Mr Danter and the council, efforts are being made to resolve the issue amicably. The case highlights the importance of proper land use and adherence to planning regulations, especially in sensitive areas close to essential community facilities such as hospices. Both parties continue to engage in discussions to find a resolution that balances commercial interests with environmental and community concerns.